4. Example

Adjust the level circuit of Chapter C shown in Figure D-2.

 
Figure D-2
Level Circuit
Obs Line dElev   Obs Line dElev
1 BMA-Q +8.91   5 BMA-R -3.56
2 BMB-Q -2.92   6 BMC-R -17.12
3 BMC-Q -4.67   7 BMD-R -21.10
4 BMD-Q -8.66   8 Q-R -12.47
(1) Observation Equations

Use Equation D-4 as the initial observation equation format, then rearrage to place the unknowns on the left side, constants and residuals on the right.

Equation D-43

 

(2) Set up Matrices

 

 

(3) Solve Unknowns: [U] = [Q] x [CTK]

[CT] x [C]

 

[CT] x [K]

 

Invert [CTC] to get [Q]

 

[Q] x [CTK]

 

These are the same elevations as in the Direct Minimization method.

(4) Adjustment Statistics

Residuals: [V] = [CU] - [K]

 

Compute So

 

Standard deviations for points Q and R elevations using Equation D-2

Adjusted observations

Adjusted observation uncertainties using Equation D-7.

Obs 1

First row of [C] and first column of [CT].

 

Because rows 1-4 of the C matrix are the same, all four observations will have the same expected error.

Ditto for observations 5-7

Obs 5

Fifth row of [C] and fifth column of [CT].

Obs 8

Eighth row of [C] and eighth column of [CT].

 

Outside of having the same [C] coefficients, why do observations 1-5 have the same expected errors? Because each connects a benchmark to the adjusted point Q (that's why they have same rows in [C]). The only error affecting those observations is point Q's. Similarly, observations 5-7 are only affected by point R. Only the eighth observation has uncertainties at both ends.

(5) Adjustment Summary

Degrees of freedom:  DF = 8-2 = 6
Std Dev Unit Wt: So = ±0.028

Adjusted elevations

  Point  Elevation  Std Dev 
  815.418  ±0.013 
  802.962  ±0.014 

 

Adjusted observations 

Line Adj Obs SE
BMA-Q 8.898 ±0.013 
BMB-Q -2.902 ±0.013 
BMC-Q -4.702 ±0.013 
BMD-Q -8.622 ±0.013 
BMA-R -3.558 ±0.014 
BMC-R -17.158 ±0.014 
BMD-R -21.078 ±0.014 
Q-R -12.456 ±0.017