## 5. Math operations

Measurements are often combined with other measurements to compute different quantities. It is sometimes a challenge to determine how many sig fig there should be in such a computed quantity. To help, we have a few rules.

#### a. Addition & Subtraction

The result has the same level of accuracy as the least accurate number. The number of sig fig in the result is independent of the number of sig fig in any of the addends.

*Example*: What is the sum of 56.35 + 105 + 0.25 + 256.35

The raw sum is 471.95

The least accurate number is 105 which is good to the nearest 1

Therefore, the sum expressed to the nearest 1 is 472

Think of it this way: It's about 154 miles from where I'm sitting to Miller Field in Milwaukee. If I move my chair one foot further away, I'm still about 154 miles away from Miller Field. I wouldn't say Miller Field is about 154 miles and one foot away. I can't can state a result any more accurately than my least accurate number.

#### b. Multiplication & Division

The result has the same number of sig fig as the least sig fig in either of the numbers being multiplied or divided.

*Example:* What is the product of 46.53 x 23.1

The raw product is 1074.843

46.53 has 4 sig fig, 23.1 has 3 sig fig

Therefore, the product expressed to 3 sig fig is 1070

Note the left 0 is significant, the right 0 is not

*Example*: convert 2.54 acres to square feet

There are 43,560 sq ft in 1 acre; this is an exact conversion factor

2.54 acres x (43,560 sq ft / 1 ac) = 110,642.4 sq ft (raw)

Since 2.54 has 3 sig fig, the area is 111,000 sq ft

#### c. Chain calculations

Use combinations of the previous rules. This often necessitates rounding intermediate values but doing so can have a cumulative effect on the final answer. To minimize this effect, intermediate values should be carried with extra digits and rounding done just once- at the end.

**Example 1**

What is the volume of the cube shown in cubic meters, Figure B-2?

Figure B-2 Volume of a Cube |

Volume of a cube is:

Metric conversion factor (exact): 2.54 cm = 1 in

*Method 1*

Convert each dimension to meters expressed to correct number of sig fig. Exact conversion factors are shown in brackets [].

L=96.3 in ← 3 sig fig

W=8.1 ft ← 2 sig fig

H=2.42 yd ← 3 sig fig

Compute the volume

Since width, W, only has 2 sig fig, the volume is **14 m ^{3}**

*Method 2*

Same as Method 1 except carry an additional sig fig for intermediate calculations.

From the previous computations: L=2.446 m; W=2.47 m; H=2.213 m

Compute the volume

Since width, W, only has 2 sig fig, the volume is **13 m ^{3}**

Carrying an additional sig fig for the intermediate calculations minimizes the cumulative rounding error. In this case, it affects the volume by one cubic meter (more than 7%).

**Example 2**

Convert 159°10'13" to decimal degrees with the correct number of sig fig.

This is an example of a single quantity (an angle) expressed in mixed units (deg, min, and sec). The initial inclination is to say there are 7 sig fig in the angle: 3 from the degrees plus 2 from the minutes plus 2 from the seconds. However that is incorrect.

- There are an
*infinite*number of sig fig in the degrees portion - the angle contains exactly 159°. Any deviation from that is taken up in the minutes and seconds. - There are an
*infinite*number of sig fig in the minutes portion - the angle contains exactly 10'. Any deviation from that is taken up in the seconds. - There are 2 sig fig in the seconds portion - it is the smallest unit and absorbs all the uncertainty in the degrees and minutes.

So how do we correctly convert mixed units to a single unit system?

Begin by converting all units to the smallest unit: convert degrees and minutes to seconds

The conversion factors are exact so 572,400" and 600" are exact.

Add the angles part together in the smallest unit.

Because the deg and min are exact, the least accurate number is 13", good to the nearest second. That makes the sum good to 6 sig fig based on the addition rule.

Convert the sum to the final units

The conversion factor is exact. The final result should have the same number of sig fig as the sum from the previous step.

The angle correctly converted is **159.170°** to 6 sig fig.